Media Usa contro Fbi per sblocco iPhone

epa05234175 (FILE) A file picture dated 23 February 2016 shows a man holding up an iPhone displaying a 'No Entry' image as part of a rally in front of an Apple Store in support of the company's privacy policy, in New York, New York, USA. The US Justice Department said on 28 March 2016, that the FBI had accessed the iPhone used by one of the shooters in the San Bernardino, California, terrorist attack last December and will not need the help of Apple to unblock the device. The news comes a week after a California court hearing at which Apple and the government were scheduled to appear was cancelled as federal authorities requested its postponement to test a possible way to access the iPhone. The move came after federal officials said that an unidentified third party came forward and demonstrated a possible method to accessing a locked iPhone, media reported. The announcement brings to an end a confrontation between the government and Apple that erupted when federal Judge Sheri Pym in mid-February ordered the tech giant to help the FBI access the information on the phone of the shooter, who - with his wife - killed 14 people in what is being investigated as a terrorist attack. Apple had refused to agree to the government's requests, after claiming that doing so would put the security of all iPhones in jeopardy.  EPA/JUSTIN LANE

Media contro Fbi: l’Ap, insieme a Usa Today e Lln, hanno citato in giudizio il Federal Bureau of investigation perche’ sveli quanto e chi ha pagato per sbloccare l’Iphone di Syed Rizwan Farook, autore con la moglie della strage di San Bernardino nel dicembre del 2015.

”Sapere la somma che l’Fbi ha valutato come appropriata da spendere, come pure l’identita’ e la reputazione del fornitore che ha fatto affari in questa vicenda, e’ essenziale per l’opinione pubblica perche’ possa controllare effettivamente le funzioni del governo ed contribuire ad evitare potenziali azioni inappropriate”, si legge nella citazione, presentata ad una corte del District of Columbia in base al Freedom of Information Act. Nel rifiutare in precedenza di fornire informazioni, il governo Usa aveva spiegato che rivelare gli atti potrebbe avere conseguenze sullo ”svolgimento del procedimento”.

La vicenda, che aveva visto la Apple e i giganti della Silicon Valley contro l’Fbi, aveva avuto risonanza a livello internazionale, riproponendo il dilemma tra privacy e sicurezza. (ANSA)

You may also like...